2026 NFL Draft Prospects: Wide Receivers (WR)
Identifying the most consistent college WRs with "above-the-line" scouting grades in the 2026 NFL Draft class.

Does your team need a wide receiver who can be the engine of the offense? Are you looking for more of a deep threat or someone who can create yards after the catch? Why not both? These are the top receivers in the 2026 draft class.
Wide Receiver Archetypes
- π Engine of the Offense
- Slot Rate β₯25% Has inside/outside flexibility
- Going Deep β₯30% Can stress defenses vertically and horizontally
- Yard/Route Run β₯2.5 Is an absolute menace on a per-route basis
- OnβTarget Catch Rate β₯90% Catches damn near everything
- π Deep Threat
- Air Yards β₯500 Has a high bullseye rate on deep shots
- Avg. Depth of Tgt β₯10.0 Closer to 15.0 than 20.0 (which is more of a windsprinter)
- πΉοΈ YAC machine
- Broken/Missed Tackles per Rec. β₯0.20 Get them five touches a game
- Yards After Catch per Rec. β₯6.0 Light the fuse and watch 'em burn
- Avg. Depth of Tgt <10.0 Feast on underneath routes
Injury Concerns
- βοΈ Availability β Injury history collected from SIS and The Athletic
- π§° Production Component
- Source: PFF Weekly Grades β Stresses the importance of game-to-game, play-to-play consistency while adjusting for variance. Accounts for every game played during their final two seasons in college.
- Apply Critical Minimum β Weekly grades below 60.0 cannot be smoothed over by two-year average. Instead, once the acceptable threshold for "below-the-line" grades has been crossed, the prospect's production grade is capped and trends toward more of a boom-bust profile.
- π¬ Film Component
- Source: SIS Scouting Reports β Watch a minimum of 3-5 games per prospect and assign a grade, from 1 (reject) to 9 (rare), to each of their three critical traits and half-dozen or so positional factors. Assign a final grade that projects how the prospect will stack up at their position by the beginning of their second season in the NFL.
- Apply Critical Minimum β Mediocre traits cannot be smoothed over by average. Instead, once the acceptable threshold for "below-the-line" grades has been crossed, the prospect's film grade is capped and trends toward a more boom-bust profile.
- βοΈ Weighting the Two: 80% Prospect Score
- Position Specific β Some positions have stronger signal in production than film or vice versa and so they are individually weighted to reflect that.
- 55/25 Production β Wide Receiver is one of the more fully fleshed out positions from a statistical, production standpoint while film tends to be more subjective ("pick your flavor.")
Prospect Chips
- π΅ Blue Chip Potential 75+ production & 75+ film
- π’ Solid Contributor β 75+ in prod. or film & 68+ in the other
- βͺ Situation Dependent β Everyone else
- π
Athleticism
- Source: Next Gen Stats β Assigns a 1-10 grade on athletic profile for every player at the Combine. In some cases, NGS estimates the scores if the prospect didn't test in Indianapolis or at their college pro day.
- RAS, MockDraftable, Football Sheets β 've added these sources to my database for future use. Many prospects had incomplete scores due to lack of testing numbers, so it made more sense to use NGS in this iteration of the model because every prospect ended up with a data point.
- π Positional Value
- Source: Spotrac β Analyzing the rookie contract scale and how much guaranteed money each pick receives against the Top 100 cap hits in the NFL by position over the next three seasons. Takes into account the Top 10 highest paid players at their position and the relative cost savings a rookie contract could provide.
- Additive Bonus β Each player was scored on a 1-10 scale using the consensus big board as a guide for projected savings. Fernando Mendoza was the only player to receive a 10 because starting QBs make anywhere from $30-50 million per season. Other positions, like RB, TE, LB, and S were capped at a maximum 5 points.
- WR Positional Value
- 1st Rd: Top 15 pick βΒ 9
- 1st Rd: Pro Bowl upside βΒ 8
- 1st Rd: Reliable starter βΒ 7
- 1st Rd: Situation dependent βΒ 6
- 2nd Rounder βΒ 5
- 3rd Rounder βΒ 2
- Projected Day 3 Pick βΒ 1
- πΉπ₯ Intangibles
- Source: Dane Brugler β The Beast prospect guide includes strengths and weaknesses for every player on the big board. Includes off-the-field concerns, quotes from scouts and coaches, and non-negotiable traits for the position.
- My Judgment β Each player was evaluated based on the additional information, including: injury history, work ethic, football iq, off-field concerns, and non-negotiables for their position. For receivers, my non-negotiable is the abililty to separate.
Badges
- π° Positional Value β Prospect earned a 5.0 or higher based on the potential value of their rookie contract.
- π Strong Character β Prospect assigned a 5.0 or higher in their intangible score.
- β οΈ Investigate Further β Prospect assigned a -5.0 or worse in their intangible score.
Player Athleticism POS Value Intangibles Badges Makai Lemon 6.5 8.0 6.0 π° π Omar Cooper Jr. 7.5 7.0 4.0 π° Carnell Tate 6.5 9.0 1.0 π° Jordyn Tyson 8.0 8.0 -1.0 π° Germie Bernard 7.5 3.0 4.0 Denzel Boston 7.4 6.0 -3.0 π° Elijah Sarratt 6.6 3.0 2.0 Zachariah Branch 8.4 3.0 -1.0 Malachi Fields 7.2 3.0 3.0 De'Zhaun Stribling 8.5 1.0 1.0 KC Concepcion 7.1 6.0 -1.0 π° Josh Cameron 8.0 1.0 2.0 Antonio Williams 7.5 3.0 -1.0 Deion Burks 9.0 2.0 -1.0 Skyler Bell 8.5 2.0 -2.0 Jeff Caldwell 9.9 1.0 0.0 Eric Rivers 8.1 0.0 -2.4 Reggie Virgil 6.2 1.0 1.0 Chris Brazzell II 8.3 3.0 -6.0 β οΈ Brenen Thompson 8.1 1.0 -2.0 Kendrick Law 8.3 1.0 -2.0 Ted Hurst 8.7 2.0 -5.0 β οΈ Bryce Lance Inc. Inc. Inc. Barion Brown 7.1 0.0 -1.0 Ja'Kobi Lane 7.9 1.0 -4.0 Kevin Coleman Jr. 6.5 1.0 -6.0 β οΈ Zavion Thomas 8.3 0.0 3.0 Chris Bell 8.0 3.0 -8.0 β οΈ Kaden Wetjen 6.6 1.0 4.0 Dillon Bell 8.0 0.0 3.0 Vinny Anthony II 6.0 0.0 3.0 Emmanuel Henderson Jr. 6.9 0.0 1.0 Chase Roberts 6.2 0.0 5.0 π CJ Daniels 6.1 1.0 -1.0 Harrison Wallace III 6.2 0.0 0.0 Caleb Douglas 7.4 1.0 -2.0 Caullin Lacy 5.1 0.0 -1.0 Aaron Anderson 5.1 0.0 3.0 Chris Hilton Jr. 7.2 0.0 0.0 Donaven McCulley 5.1 0.0 -5.0 β οΈ Eric McAlister 5.9 0.0 -15.0 β οΈ Jalen Walthall Inc. Inc. Inc. Malik Benson Inc. Inc. Inc. Colbie Young Inc. Inc. -15.0 β οΈ
Head back to the Big Board:
The Top 300 Players in the 2026 NFL DraftCaleb Downs, Jeremiyah Love, and Sonny Styles headline a deep 2026 NFL Draft class.

Omar Cooper Jr. profiles as a high-volume, every down wideout early on in his rookie year.
Top Wide Receiver Prospects
POS RK Player Grade Archetype Badges WR1 Makai Lemon 84 Dawg π Β· π WR2 Omar Cooper Jr. 79 Slot π Β· πΉοΈ Β· βοΈ WR3 Carnell Tate 78 X π Β· π WR4 Jordyn Tyson 74 Mr. Glass βοΈ WR5 Germie Bernard 74 Thinking Man's Deebo WR6 Denzel Boston 72 Nepo Baby X π Β· π WR7 Elijah Sarratt 72 Redzone Threat WR8 Zachariah Branch 72 Gadget πΉοΈ Β· βοΈ WR9 Malachi Fields 71 X βοΈ WR10 De'Zhaun Stribling 71 Hybrid WR11 KC Concepcion 70 Misses Layups WR12 Josh Cameron 70 Dollar Store Deebo WR13 Antonio Williams 69 Slot βοΈ WR14 Deion Burks 68 Hybrid βοΈ WR15 Skyler Bell 68 Hybrid π WR16 Jeff Caldwell 68 Z WR17 Eric Rivers 66 Z βοΈ WR18 Reggie Virgil 66 X WR19 Chris Brazzell II 66 Hybrid π WR20 Brenen Thompson 65 Hybrid π Β· βοΈ WR21 Kendrick Law 65 Tyrone Tracy πΉοΈ WR22 Ted Hurst 64 X π WR23 Bryce Lance 64 Trey Lance's Little Brother WR24 Barion Brown 64 Bullet Train WR25 Ja'Kobi Lane 63 Diva (Complimentary) βοΈ WR26 Kevin Coleman Jr. 63 Slot βοΈ WR27 Zavion Thomas 62 Hybrid WR28 Chris Bell 61 Diva (Derogatory) βοΈ WR29 Kaden Wetjen 61 Dynamic Kickoff Weapon πΉοΈ WR30 Dillon Bell 61 Hybrid WR31 Vinny Anthony II 60 Hybrid πΉοΈ WR32 Emmanuel Henderson Jr. 58 X WR33 Chase Roberts 58 X π Β· βοΈ WR34 CJ Daniels 57 Hybrid βοΈ WR35 Harrison Wallace III 56 X π Β· βοΈ WR36 Caleb Douglas 55 X π Β· βοΈ WR37 Caullin Lacy 54 Slot πΉοΈ WR38 Aaron Anderson 53 Xavier Restrepo πΉοΈ Β· βοΈ WR39 Chris Hilton Jr. 49 Z βοΈ WR40 Donaven McCulley 48 X WR41 Eric McAlister 44 X π WR42 Jalen Walthall 43 Deep Threat WR43 Malik Benson 40 Z WR44 Colbie Young 22 X
Receiver archetypes are tied to 2025 usage rates, with a hybrid role meaning they did a little bit of everything.
Some of these wideouts will end up playing a meaningfully different role in the league, which could impact how quickly they earn consistent snaps on offense.
Raw Prospect Scores
Player Production Film Chip Makai Lemon 80.5 71.3 π’ Omar Cooper Jr. 77.0 66.4 βͺ Carnell Tate 76.5 72.6 π’ Jordyn Tyson 78.1 75.2 π΅ Germie Bernard 75.4 65.1 βͺ Denzel Boston 77.7 69.8 π’ Elijah Sarratt 77.8 65.1 βͺ Zachariah Branch 75.0 73.8 π’ Malachi Fields 75.5 66.4 βͺ De'Zhaun Stribling 75.8 65.1 βͺ KC Concepcion 73.7 64.0 βͺ Josh Cameron 74.3 63.3 βͺ Antonio Williams 76.1 69.4 π’ Deion Burks 71.7 64.6 βͺ Skyler Bell 76.6 69.9 π’ Jeff Caldwell 73.5 57.0 βͺ Eric Rivers 75.8 65.5 βͺ Reggie Virgil 73.7 64.6 βͺ Chris Brazzell II 73.1 72.6 βͺ Brenen Thompson 73.2 70.4 βͺ Kendrick Law 75.1 57.0 βͺ Ted Hurst 75.8 65.1 βͺ Bryce Lance Inc. Inc. βͺ Barion Brown 71.9 65.1 βͺ Ja'Kobi Lane 75.5 65.5 βͺ Kevin Coleman Jr. 76.8 70.4 π’ Zavion Thomas 72.8 35.4 βͺ Chris Bell 75.0 65.5 βͺ Kaden Wetjen 71.6 35.3 βͺ Dillon Bell 70.3 38.5 βͺ J. Michael Sturdivant 70.8 41.5 βͺ Vinny Anthony II 73.6 34.4 βͺ Emmanuel Henderson Jr. 73.4 33.5 βͺ Chase Roberts 75.9 29.5 βͺ CJ Daniels 74.3 42.9 βͺ Harrison Wallace III 74.6 28.3 βͺ Caleb Douglas 73.0 33.5 βͺ Caullin Lacy 71.9 35.5 βͺ Aaron Anderson 74.2 29.3 βͺ Chris Hilton Jr. 68.7 27.5 βͺ Donaven McCulley 73.0 27.5 βͺ Eric McAlister 77.4 36.5 βͺ Jalen Walthall Inc. Inc. βͺ Malik Benson Inc. Inc. βͺ Colbie Young Inc. Inc. βͺ
π¦ΊPlayers with incomplete scores had missing data points and will be revisited after the draft. Bandit Football regrets the error.
Athleticism, Positional Value, Intagibles